The Michael Caloz Cognitive Functions Test

1/5

The Michael Caloz Cognitive Functions Test

(Want to take my test in a different language? I recommend the Google Translate extension.)

Your personality type shapes your reality

There's an amazing word called sonder.

It's the realization that each random passerby is living a life as vivid and complex as your own. That every single person you see has their own goals, strengths, and struggles.

We can't help but imagine that everyone else sees the world pretty much like we do. But the truth is that most of those minds in the crowd would be utterly alien to you.

If you're detail-oriented, does it blow your mind that other people can submit a resume full of spelling mistakes? If you're a lover of beauty, how can other people ignore a gorgeous sunset? If you're focused on innovation, why are other people so stuck on tradition?

People's minds are structured very differently, and that's why it feels like we're talking past each other so often.

What if there were a better way?

Learning to speak the secret language

Think about your group of friends or co-workers. Who's the planner? The crazy idea person? The cheerleader?

We don't want to box people in, but some natural archetypes do emerge in terms of how people's minds are organized. The problem is that it can take a while to understand which archetype fits other people and even ourselves.

Imagine if you could quickly exchange a single code word when you met someone: the name of your archetype. With this one word, you'd immediately understand what energizes them, how they absorb new information, and how they make decisions.

Think about how much that would transform your ability to communicate with your colleagues, friends, and romantic partners.

Good news: There are in fact 16 code words, and you're about to learn them.

(Note: Much of the theory behind this test is influenced by the work of Myers, Briggs, Jung, and others. However, this is not a Myers-Briggs Type Indicator® (MBTI®) assessment test. That is a trademarked tool developed by the Myers-Briggs Company, with whom I have no affiliation… tap for more on this …My test uses a four-letter acronym format to describe 16 types, which is shared by a number of typology frameworks such as Jung-Myers, Socionics, and Keirsey. But this test is entirely my own, using my questions, model, and algorithm to calculate your results. All type descriptions are my own writing influenced by the work of Myers, Briggs, Jung, and many others, as well as my own observations after coaching many people of various types. If you're interested in the MBTI® Instrument, you can read more about it here.)


Some of My Other Projects

Thanks so much for taking my test. If you appreciate the way I explore nuances and explain complex information, please consider checking out my other projects:

YouTube Channel: Full-Stack Human

I speak at the intersection of typology, psychology, deep personal growth, and existential questioning. (It's also available in YouTube Podcast format.)

About Me

Learn more about me and my journey—from having a highly successful career but feeling lonely and empty inside, to completely transforming my life to one filled with clear purpose, consistent motivation, and authentic connection.

Blog: Synthesizing & Symplifying Complexity

As an ENTP, one of my greatest gifts is synthesizing, categorizing, and simplifying information. I write about topics like personal growth, motivation, feelings, group dynamics, and personality typing.

Coaching & Counseling (customized for your personality type)

I've spent over a decade working with leaders and teams at some of the top companies in the world. Do you struggle with decision-making, procrastination and motivation, social anxiety and confidence, fully feeling your feelings, or worrying that you're on the wrong life path? That's exactly where I was several years ago, and I believe I can help you.

Introduction to Race in the United States for White People (by a white person)

My goal is to guide you through the complex subject of race and racism with gentleness and without judgment or shaming. It's ok to have a lot of questions. If you're looking for Race 101, this is a great place to start. I'll go through it all step-by-step in a way that's non-political and approachable to anyone.

My 7-day guided meditation series—for complete beginners (and intermediates too)

Meditation has completely changed my life. As a former skeptic/atheist turned Zen Buddhist, I consider meditation to be the single most important skill worth developing. It's foundational to productivity, existential fulfillment, emotional intelligence, and beyond. If you're an analytical thinker who believes meditation just isn't for you, or if you've tried before and it didn't work, my guide is for you.

Change Log (history of test updates)

May 14, 2025 Update: Some restructuring of the results page to improve the flow and offer actionable resources you might find valuable.

April 29, 2025 Update: Minor UI adjustments on mobile, and adjusted my list of projects on this page.

April 6, 2025 Update: Added a new button on the main personality test page to jump straight to the test and skip the intro instruction pages. If you're a frequent visitor, I hope that will save you some time!

November 29, 2024 Update: Three updates today:

1) Based on some feedback from Reddit, I removed the “title card” at the beginning of every section of the test that used to tell you which functions are about to be compared (e.g., Ti versus Te) as well as the “summary card” at the end of that section that tells you how you scored in each function. People felt like it might bias the user to know in advance which functions are about to be compared, so now the test is organized as more of a continuous flow of questions through different sets of cognitive functions. Don’t worry, though: You can still see exactly how you scored for each cognitive function by tapping "Want to see your raw test results?” on the results page.

2) I also improved the wording of a few examples and made some minor wording improvements to the results page.

3) Per some feedback, I changed the name “Marie Curie” in the INTP example section to “Marie Skłodowska Curie.”

October 3, 2024 Update: Oops, looks like that last update broke the test. Sorry about that, and thanks to the people who contacted me to point it out. It should be all fixed now!

September 26, 2024 Update: Major updates to the results page: After a lot of thought, I decided to completely remove the charts. They've been there for years, but I realized they offered more confusion than clarity. The scores listed next to each type offer a much more streamlined experience. But, if you want more detail, you can still tap the button at the top of the Results section to see your raw results. Additionally, I simplified and improved a lot of the copy on the results page to offer a more efficient, cohesive user experience.

August 1, 2024 Update: Improved some of the new cognitive function icons on the results page based on some helpful feedback, thank you!

July 22, 2024 Update: On the results page, added a representative icon for every cognitive function and type family. Plus, I made a few minor visual improvements to the mobile version of the test.

July 13, 2024 Update: 1) Added some info on how neurodiversity and trauma might relate to type.

2) Refined some of the wording on various test questions to make them even more clear.

3) Added some clarifications to the instructions as well as to the language on the results page.

4) Clarified that the neutral option can mean either “neither” or “both”.

June 24, 2024 Update: Some small adjustments to the results page.

April 25, 2024 Update: Minor improvements to some of the wording on the intro pages and to one of the Fi vs. Fe questions.

June 30, 2023 Update: On the final results page, I added some more information on how neurotype (i.e., autism) and culture can influence type. To read it, head to the results page, and hit the "+" box after "And here are some important things to keep in mind..."

June 21, 2023 Update: I finished the tailored results page for ENTJ's, including my two top tips for that type, which means all the 'N' types are now complete. I also went back and improved the pages for ENTP's, INTP's, INTJ's, and ENFP's to make them all consistent with strengths, challenges, and tips.

June 17, 2023 Update: I finished the tailored results page for INFP's, including my two top tips for that type.

June 14, 2023 Update: Minor usability updates to the homepage and elsewhere.

June 13, 2023 Update: I finished the tailored results page for ENFJ's, including my two top tips for that type.

March 12, 2023 Update: Biggest update in a while: I completely rewrote the strengths & weaknesses for every single type on the results page. Those hadn't changed substantially since I created this test many years ago, so these new descriptions better reflect the more mature, nuanced understanding of typology that I have today (though I'm still learning every day, so I'm always open to feedback: michael@michaelcaloz.com).

November 21, 2022 Update: 1) I'm happy to report that my test has become increasingly popular all over the world, and I've had many offers to help me translate it into various languages. I appreciate the passion I've felt from everyone, but it's quite a large undertaking to translate a website like this. So, for now at least, I've added a link on the homepage to the Google Translate browser extension, which seems to do a pretty good job.

2) I adjusted some of the wording for the instructions on the results page. And, I reworded some of the Si function questions.

3) I've begun adding two of my top tips for each type. So far I've finished ENTP, INTP, and INTJ.

July 4, 2022 Update: In addition to a few small stylistic updates, I added a way to view your raw results after you finish the test. It'll tell you your exact numbers in each area. I know a lot of you like to share screenshots of your chart results on Reddit (and other personality typing communities), so I packed all the raw data into a small enough area that you should be able to easily screenshot this new section instead to share (since it's more precise than the charts). You can find it on the final results page at the bottom of the "Your Results: Cognitive Functions" section, just above the area where all the types are listed. Have fun! 🙂

January 2, 2022 Update: I updated the questions in the Se vs. Si portion of the test (as an ENTP with Si as my fourth function, I recognize that I sometimes have a blind spot around that function). Thanks to a visitor for inspiring this!

September 13, 2021 Update: Since I haven't heard about any more bugs, the main test is now what had been the beta described below. The old version of the test is still available here.

September 1, 2021 Update:

Please see my explanation of the beta below. Thanks for your feedback! I believe I've addressed the bug that many of you emailed me about where it would keep adding more points if you used the back button after completing one of the cognitive function sections.

This is the beta. Click here to return to the regular non-beta site.

Thanks!

August 15, 2021 Update:

Exciting news: I've implemented the two biggest requests I receive for this test.

1) I completely redesigned the interface on mobile for selecting between two choices. Instead of having to tap one of the five small dots to indicate "definitely A," "slightly B," etc., there are now larger buttons right under the choices A and B.

2) I added a "back" button so you can return to the previous question if you made a mistake or changed your mind. If you're on desktop, you can also use the left-arrow and right-arrow keys to navigate forward and backward (but please keep in mind that when you go back—whether with the button or the arrow key—you'll reset whatever you'd previously selected for that question).

These were some technically-complex changes, so I'll leave this as the "beta version" for a while in case you discover any issues. Please leave a comment here if anything looks off with the scoring, you notice any other problems, or you have any other feedback.

This is the beta. Click here to return to the regular non-beta site.

Thanks!

June 23, 2021 Update:

I revamped the detailed results page for ENFP's.

March 4, 2021 Update:

Three updates today:

First, on the final page of instructions in the intro, I wrote about some of the ways your type can be skewed by your life circumstances, and I made the suggestion to answer the questionnaire as your child or teenage self might have.

Second, I added a big new section to the top textbox on the results page (at the bottom of it). It has info about: using typology for good reasons rather than boxing people in, immature and mature versions of types, and whether or not your type can change over time.

Third, I completely revamped the detailed results page for INFJ's.

February 7, 2021 Update:

Exciting news: I added a brand new section to the test with four new questions (screens 29 and 30). Before this, the test only asked you questions comparing Te to Ti, Fe to Fi, Se to Si, and Ne to Ni. To be more thorough, the new page has a question each for comparing Te to Fe, Ti to Fi, Se to Ne, and Si to Ni. This should add even more precision to your results, and your old bookmarked results URL's should still work fine with the new version. If anything feels off with this new update, you can access the previous version here. Please email me at personality@michaelcaloz.com if you have any feedback or notice any problems.

I also made a few small tweaks to hopefully decrease the page load time slightly. And, I added some links above to my other projects. Thanks again for visiting, and I hope you're doing ok with everything going on in the world!

October 1, 2020 Update:

I've updated the results algorithm for the first time in a few years. This is based on a combination of feedback from visitors (thank you!) and my own evolving opinions about the relative importance of each piece when calculating a person's most likely types.

The algorithm change isn't dramatic; but, among several changes, the most significant one is reducing the importance placed on the "type families" question toward the end (by the way, I also updated the descriptions of each of those families).

Any saved results URLs you have from the previous algorithm will automatically update to use the new one. And if you'd prefer to use the old version of the test, you can access it here.

P.S., Pro-tip for desktop users: you can use the right-arrow key on your keyboard to quickly advance through the instruction screens at the beginning of the test.

June 8, 2020 Update: Thanks for visiting. Do you have questions about race, racism, or the protests happening right now? If so, I'd like to humbly suggest another website I created that's dedicated to explaining race in America in an approachable, step-by-step way without judgment or politics. Thank you, and I hope you stay safe with everything going on.

April 26, 2020 Update: Redesigned the mobile version of this site. Thanks for sticking with it earlier when it wasn't as easy to use.

2/5

So what exactly are we talking about here?

Carl Jung—one of the most renowned psychologists in history—discovered patterns for how people take in new information and make decisions. He called these 8 patterns cognitive functions, and groupings of those functions became what we now refer to as the 16 types.

Everyone is unique. But Jung's research revealed some clear correlations between personality attributes. For example, most people who speak quickly and "think out loud" tend to also recharge their energy by being around people. And most people who prefer step-by-step procedures also tend to be more oriented toward the tangible past or present than the future or the abstract.

By mastering type dynamics, you'll be able to answer questions like... (TIP: Throughout the site, you'll see these buttons when more information is available. Tap once to expand and again to collapse.)

Beyond your average personality test

Ever take an online quiz with questions like, "Would you rather stay home and read a book or go to a party?" How are you supposed to answer that? The only reasonable response is, "It depends."

Don't worry: This test is different. I've very carefully written my questions to get to the heart of what makes you tick.

So what can you expect? Well, the 16-types personality system is popular everywhere from Fortune 500 companies to online dating websites. So instead of introducing new terms, we'll be using the same four-letter personality types you've probably already heard of (things like ISTJ and ENFP).

But, nearly every other personality test stops with those four letters. We'll be going a step further by breaking those four-letter types down into their Jungian cognitive functions (things like Ti and Se).

So guess what? Contrary to what those other overly-simplistic personality tests would tell you, it's perfectly normal if you like partying one night but feel like staying home alone to read the next. Because the truth is: No one is 100% an extrovert or 100% an introvert. We're all a bit of both, and your type's cognitive functions will explain why.

Skeptical? You should be

Like I said, there are a lot of bad personality tests out there, and I'm promising a lot.

But, personality typing is all about understanding differences. And different communication styles work best for different types of people. So, let's put that concept to work. If you're a skeptic, click the + button for an alternative introduction to this subject.

Snake oil for sale

You're skeptical, and reasonably so. How is this 16-types stuff any different from fortune-telling?

You're probably thinking that each of these personality types will be generic enough that anyone can be made to believe that each one applies to them.

Fair concern, but here are three reasons why this system is different:

  1. There's no way that all of the types will fit you. If you're dubious, you can quickly skip to the results page and you'll see that each type is quite distinct. Once you really understand the types, there should be no doubt about which one you are, and there's no way to be half way in between two types. Many personality websites get this part wrong. They make it seem, for example, that an INTJ and an INTP are pretty similar because they have three letters in common. In reality, they're completely different because they have none of the same cognitive functions.
  2. Indeed, the professional psychology community does have very legitimate concerns with how the 16 types are often tested for and portrayed online. I share their critique that many of the interpretations you'll find out there are shallow and lack nuance. That's why my test goes way beyond that kind of overly-simplistic thinking (you're either 100% Extrovert or 100% Introvert!). It focuses instead on the cognitive functions developed by the highly-celebrated psychologist Carl Jung, and it incorporates many other ideas that have been added on since his time by experts all over the world, as well as my own original research working with hundreds of clients.
  3. This is not simply one of those internet quizzes where you answer some questions and you're told your type. Rather, you'll be given a list of roughly ranked potential results with information about each. Then it's up to you—the true expert on yourself—to decide which one makes the most sense.

How to trick people

The Barnum Effect is a technique used by self-proclaimed magicians and psychics. They might promise a hapless victim that they've seen into their mind and written something very specifically tailored to them. In reality, the charlatan simply wrote something vague and general enough that anyone would find some truth in it. Here's a short example:

  1. You like when people admire you, but you can be a little critical of yourself. You sometimes second guess your decisions and are less confident inside than you appear. You're an independent thinker who is at times sociable and at times reserved. You have some weaknesses that you've learned to overcome but you might not yet be living up to your full potential.

Getting it right

In contrast, take a look at these three Jungian personality type summaries:

  1. You've always been a dreamer, and you feel like you can do anything if you put your mind to it. You constantly have new ideas, and you love connecting the dots in your mind. Traditions are overrated. Who cares how things have always been done if there's a better way? You're energized by the unknown, and you're curious about everything. You have some trouble balancing social niceties with telling the hard truth, and you think about past mistakes you've made a lot. You're not necessarily the life of the party, but you get energized by selling your ideas to a group.
  2. You'd consider yourself a very down-to-earth and reliable person. You don't have your head in the clouds, and you like focusing on what's going on around you. You highly value someone's personal experiences, and you trust what you can see and touch, not vague concepts and ideas that have never been tested in reality. It's important to build upon sound traditions and to leave behind a legacy based on a strong work ethic. Why reinvent the wheel if we already have something that works just fine? You're a bit on the quiet side, but you get along well with people as long as they have manners and treat you with respect.
  3. You're an idealist with a very finely defined internal value system. To you, a life well lived means being authentic to yourself. You have strong convictions, and you have trouble with conflict. It can be hard for you to lead others to take on your cause, and you need time alone to recharge. You have ideas you believe in, but it can be difficult to actually act on them and make something happen. You have rich internal worlds of fantasy and imagination that you like to retreat to, and you might be very interested in an art like music or writing.

Sure, we all act a bit differently in different situations, but those are three fundamentally different ways of looking at the world. There are 16 types, and they all take in, process, and act on information differently.

3/5

Personality Type Theory 101

There are 16 personality types, each made up of 4 letters called dimensions.

There are a lot of common misconceptions about this kind of personality typing...

If you've read anything about the 16 types, you've probably seen descriptors like "Feeler" and "Thinker." The logic behind these ideas is reasonable, but some of the words they've traditionally stood for can be confusing. Being a Thinker doesn't mean you're a robot incapable of feeling feelings, and being a Feeler doesn't mean you're overly emotional and unable to use logic.

Even worse are "Perceiver" and "Judger," which really are not very representative at all of what those letters actually mean. So, forget all those words and just remember the letters instead.

Also, remember that your type simply reveals your preferences for how you take in information and make decisions. You probably use all of the letters every day, but your four-letter type combination reveals which ones come most naturally to you.

Here's a short overview of the 4 dimensions (to avoid confusion, we'll ignore the badly-chosen words they stand for and just look at the letters):

4/5

Is it really so black and white?

People in the psychology community often look down on the 16 types, calling them too simplistic. For example, what if you feel like you're in between a T and an F? Or, just because you're an S, does that mean you have no N whatsoever? What if you're a bit of everything?

That's where Jungian type dynamics come in. The truth is that a T does indeed have some F in them, an N has some S in them as well, and everyone is part I and part E.

The T/F and N/S dimensions actually have "sub-types" called cognitive functions. T splits into Ti and Te, N splits into Ni and Ne, etc. The 'i' stands for introverted and the 'e' for extroverted, so that Ti refers to a T facing inward and Te refers to a T facing outward. As you can see, even though two types might have a letter like T in common, each type's version of T might manifest very differently.

All 16 types have four cognitive functions (each of which can be Ti, Te, Fi, Fe, Si, Se, Ni, or Ne), and they're in a very specific order:

  1. Primary: the function you use the most and are most comfortable with (it's unconscious because it comes so naturally to you)
  2. Auxiliary: complements your primary and is used quite often as well (this one requires conscious thought until you truly master it later in life)
  3. Tertiary: less developed and takes longer to mature (you begin life fairly weak in this area, but through conscious effort you can become skilled in it)
  4. Inferior: matures latest in life, and it can be thought of as your biggest weakness (unconscious, and it can be especially troublesome because you might be less aware of it or have trouble understanding how it works)

To recap, every type has 4 dimensions and 4 cognitive functions. For example, an ENTP has the dimensions E, N, T, and P, and it has the cognitive functions Ne, Ti, Fe, and Si. Notice how even though there's no F in ENTP, they actually still do use an F-based cognitive function. Figuring out a type's cognitive functions can be a little tricky, but here's how to do it if you're interested (otherwise, the final page of the test will list them all)...

  1. First, some context: The second dimension is known as the information-gathering dimension, and it's always N or S. The third dimension is known as the decision-making dimension, and it's always T or F. The fourth dimension, P or J, determines if the primary cognitive function is an information-gathering one or a decision-making one. Finally, two of the cognitive functions are always introverted and two are always extroverted.
  2. Ok, check the type's fourth dimension, either P or J. If it's a J, it means that their decision-making function (which is always either T or F) will be extroverted, so Te or Fe. If it's a P, it means that their decision-making function will be introverted, so Ti or Fi.
  3. In the case of ISFJ, the fourth dimension is a J and the decision-making function is an F. Therefore, the F will become an Fe.
  4. Next, check the type's first dimension, either E or I. The primary cognitive function will always follow the type's first dimension. So since ISFJ starts with an I, it means that the primary function will have an i. Now, look back to the function we already decided for the ISFJ: Fe. Since it has an e, that means it can't be the primary function, so it must be the secondary one. Therefore, the information-gathering function (always S or N) must be the primary. So since the ISFJ has an S, it has to be Si.
  5. That's actually everything we need. The third function is always the opposite of the second function. So in this case the opposite of Fe is Ti. And, the fourth function is always the opposite of the first function. So in this case, the opposite of Si is Ne (because i is the opposite of e and N is the opposite of S — "opposite" in the sense that they're the two choices in their dimensions: I/E and N/S).
  6. So, for ISFJs, the functions are Si, Fe, Ti, Ne.
  7. One more example: Let's do ESTP.
  8. It ends with P, so we know that their T/F will be introverted. ESTP contains T, so it will be Ti.
  9. Since we already found Ti, we know that the S/N will have to be an e. ESTP contains S, so it will be Se. And since ESTP starts with an E, we know that the Se will be the primary function because of its e.
  10. That's all we need. We know that the third will be the opposite of the second (Ti), so Fe. And the fourth will be the opposite of the first (Se), so Ni.
  11. So, ESTP breaks down into Se Ti Fe Ni.

5/5

Keep in mind as you take the test

Each section will help you decide which of the cognitive function variants you're most comfortable with (e.g., Fi or Fe, Si or Se, etc.). Don't worry: I'll explain what those mean on the final results page.

Everyone uses all of the cognitive functions throughout their lives, but some should seem far more familiar/natural than others. That's why it's important to indicate how strongly you identify with each one.

Choose the "neutral" option if you feel that both choices apply equally well, if you can't decide, or if you don't particularly identify with either one. (P.S. The two choices won't always be opposites. They might just represent two potential approaches or perspectives.)

To get the best results...

  • Be honest and answer what feels most like who you truly are, not who you wish you were or who you feel forced to be by external pressures like work or family.
  • Each of us has led a complex life full of all sorts of influences: how you were raised, the society and culture you were born into, what you were told a "good person" looks like, what you saw on TV, how you were incentivized to act at work, what you were told someone of your gender is supposed to be like, and so much more.
  • It can be hard to find your true personality type underneath all that baggage and all those layers of armor you might have had to put on.

    So, as you answer the questionnaire, try to think about how your truest, most authentic self would answer. If you can, imagine how you might have answered as a kid or a teenager (or, if your childhood was full of trauma, perhaps try to consider how a child version of you might have acted who was well supported and accepted as your truest self).

    Notice which answer you would feel most pulled toward if no one was watching or judging you.
  • Remember too that personality types apply to your whole life, so think in broad terms about the words used (e.g., "project" could mean either a task at work or a hobby at home).
  • It can be helpful to compare yourself to other people you know (or even to characters in movies or books).

    For example, if a question asks whether you like group brainstorming, consider where you fall on the spectrum at work — when brainstorming time comes around, are you one of the most excited or least excited of your colleagues?

    Similarly, if the question asks about your relationship with the physical world, do you tend to be clumsier than your friends, or are you the person constantly pointing out beautiful or interesting things around you?

    Often, when we're especially gifted at something, we can set our standards too high for ourselves. So, if you're, say, highly imaginative, you might think of yourself as only average since you're comparing yourself to your favorite world-class author or poet. But if you instead were to compare yourself to the average person, you'd realize that you're in fact quite skilled in this regard.

P.S. Curious about how neurodiversity and/or trauma might factor in? I write about that here and offer some tips to keep in mind as you answer the questions in my test.

The test should take 15-20 minutes. Let's get started.

🎉 You're all done!

Let's get you what you came here for. You're most likely one of these three types:

But, the point values are just a starting point. You are the only one who truly knows how your mind works.

So, the next step is to read through your top-scoring types and find the best match. Your detailed results are below—as always, no signup required. But first:

🧭 Curious how this could lead to real change?

(Or, 👇 Skip straight to your results)

Michael Caloz photo

Hi, I'm Michael (ENTP).

As a Transformation Coach & Existential Counselor, I built this test to help curious people like you deepen your self-awareness.

You value personal growth. But you might struggle with things like motivation, procrastination, or stuckness.

If that's you, here are four next steps to consider:

My YouTube channel sits at the intersection of typology, psychology, deep personal growth, and existential questioning.
I work one-on-one with all types, but I specialize in helping NTPs, NFPs, INTJs, INFJs get unstuck, find meaning, and transform their lives.
This self-paced course for 'N' types will help you overcome "analysis paralysis"—making decisions big and small with confident ease instead of overwhelm and regret.
Stop dreading Mondays. This is the ultimate guide to help 'N' types find a life path that makes you excited to get out of bed (even if you're multi-passionate & indecisive).

Which one sounds most like you?